Village Development Planning Model in the Border Region Between the Republic of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste
Society Volume 12 Issue 2#2024
PDF (English)

Keywords

Border Regions Governance Participatory Planning Sustainability Village Development Transformation

How to Cite

Wula, H. V. M., Atok, F., & Sitorus, D. R. H. (2024). Village Development Planning Model in the Border Region Between the Republic of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. Society, 12(2), 603-613. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.601

Share

Views
  • Abstract 165
  • PDF (English) 69
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

Villages are integral to national development and serve as a cornerstone for broader regional advancement. This study introduces an innovative village development planning model designed specifically for border areas, emphasizing the alignment of national policies with the needs of local communities. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the research examines the distinctive challenges and opportunities faced by villages in border regions, with a particular focus on Napan Village, situated along the border between the Republic of Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis and subsequently processed using a systematic framework of data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The proposed model highlights the importance of participatory planning and structured implementation to address community aspirations while ensuring alignment with national priorities. By offering a replicable framework for addressing the complexities of border areas, this study contributes to the discourse on governance and sustainable development, enhancing the capacity of border villages for inclusive and long-term growth.

PDF (English)

References

Akbar, G. G., Hermawan, Y., & Karlina, A. L. (2019). Analisis Perencanaan Pembangunan Desa Di Desa Sukamaju Kecamatan Cilawu Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Pembangunan Dan Kebijakan Publik, 10(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36624/jpkp.v10i2.64

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village Governance, Community Life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brinkerhoff, D. W., & Morgan, P. J. (2010). Capacity and capacity development: Coping with complexity. Public Administration and Development, 30(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.559

Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Chambers, R. (2014). Rural Development: Putting the last first. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835815

Chotimah, C., Widodo, R., & Handayani, T. (2019). Efektivitas Lembaga Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Desa Bululawang. Jurnal Civic Hukum, 4(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v4i2.9184

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Penelitian Kualitatif & Desain Riset: Memilih di antara Lima Pendekatan (A. L. Lazuardi (ed.)). Pustaka Pelajar.

Fitrah, N. (2013). Problematika Pelaksanaan Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan Desa (Musrenbang Desa) Studi Kasus Desa Rumpa Kecematan Mapilli. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan & Ilmu Komunikasi, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://journal.lppm-unasman.ac.id/index.php/mitzal/article/view/273

Fox, J. A. (2015). Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say? World Development, 72, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011

Grindle, M. S. (2009). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton University Press.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough?: An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Imawan, A., Irianto, G., & Prihatiningtias, Y. W. (2019). Peran Akuntabilitas Pemerintah Desa Dalam Membangun Kepercayaan Publik. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2019.04.10009

Lauermann, J. (2018). Geographies of mega‐urbanization. Geography Compass, 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12396

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lisnawati, L., & Lestari, S. (2019). Analisis faktor pembangunan desa dalam pengembangan desa mandiri berkelanjutan pada Desa Bunghu Aceh Besar. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v4i2.3390

Mamoto, N., Sumampouw, I., & Undap, G. (2018). Implementasi Pembangunan Infrastruktur Desa Dalam Penggunaan Dana Desa Tahun 2017 (Studi) Desa Ongkaw Ii Kecamatan Sinonsayang Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Jurnal Eksekutif, 1(1), 1–11. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jurnaleksekutif/article/view/21950

Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2012). Localizing Development. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8256-1

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Negara, S. D., & Hutchinson, F. E. (2021). The Impact of Indonesia‘s Decentralization Reforms Two Decades On: Introduction. Southeast Asian Economies, 38(3), 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae38-3a

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2016). Local and regional development in practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315767673-8

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. SAGE Publications.

Samad, Z., Mustanir, A., & Pratama, M. Y. P. (2019). Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Musyawarah Rencana Pembangunan Untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance Kabupaten Enrekang. Moderat: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 5(4), 379–395. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat/article/viewFile/3014/2750

Samaun, R., Bakri, B., & Mediansyah, A. R. (2022). Upaya Pemerintah Desa Mendorong Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Desa Oluhuta Kecamatan Atinggola Kabupaten Gorontalo Utara. Hulondalo Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.59713/jipik.v1i1.18

Scott, J. W. (2015). Bordering, Border Politics and Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe. In GeoJournal Library (Vol. 115, pp. 27–44). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18452-4_2

Shatkin, G. (2014). Reinterpreting the meaning of the “Singapore model”: State capitalism and urban planning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12095

Smith, B. C. (2023). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. Taylor & Francis.

Smoke, P. (2015). Managing Public Sector Decentralization in Developing Countries: Moving Beyond Conventional Recipes. Public Administration and Development, 35(4), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1736

Susan, N., & Budirahayu, T. (2018). Village Government Capacity in the Implementation of Village Law No. 6 of 2015 in Indonesia. In B. McLellan (Ed.), Sustainable Future for Human Security (pp. 17–27). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5433-4_2

Wróblewski, Ł., & Kasperek, A. (2019). Euroregion as an Entity Stimulating the Sustainable Development of the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services in a City Divided by a Border. Sustainability, 11(8), 2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082232

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Handrianus Vianey Melin Wula, Fransiskus Atok, Detson Ray Halomoan Sitorus

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.