Abstract
Crime is a daily phenomenon that emerges within society. From a structural-functional perspective, crime is considered disturbing and disruptive to the harmonious and stable order of life (social pathology). Drug-related crime is considered a serious crime, even bordering on extraordinary crime, as it has a significant negative impact on the wider community. The research aims to describe the handling of drug-related crimes by the police apparatus in South Sumatra. The research method used is qualitative research to examine incidents and various data variations that emerge in the field, employing a case study approach. The results and discussions show that the South Sumatra Provincial Police have been responsive in addressing drug-related issues in the province, ranging from prevention to rehabilitation, using 4 approaches: 1) Soft Power Coach, 2) Hard Power Coach, 3) Smart Power Coach, and 4) Corporation. The use of drugs can occur due to several factors, namely Poverty Factors, Environmental Factors, Criminal Involvement Factors, and Dependency Factors, highlighting the need for optimal supervision to prevent individuals who have recovered from relapsing into drug consumption. BNN South Sumatra collaborates with the PKK board to create a drug-free village with the aim of monitoring indications of drug use in the village community and forming a rehabilitation task force that is responsible for socializing the community not to use drugs again and stay away from drug use in the community.
References
Alfatih, A. (2010). Implementasi Kebijakan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Unpad Press.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Statistik Kriminal 2022. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2022/11/30/4022d3351bf3a05aa6198065/statistik-kriminal-2022.html
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design, Pendekatan Metode Kualitatitf, Kuantitatif dan Campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2003). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University Press.
Jacinto, C., Duterte, M., Sales, P., & Murphy, S. (2008). “I’m Not a Real Dealer”: The Identity Process of Ecstasy Sellers. Journal of Drug Issues, 38(2), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260803800203
Kartono, K. (2017). Patologi Sosial 2 - Kenakalan Remaja (14th ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2015). Teori Kriminologi, Konteks dan Konsekuensi. Prenadamedia Group.
Mustofa, M. (2010). Kriminologi (2nd ed.). Sari Ilmu Persada.
Newcomb, M. D., Galaif, E. R., & Locke, T. F. (2001). Substance use diagnoses within a community sample of adults: Distinction, comorbidity, and progression over time. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(3), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.32.3.239
Prahassacitta, V. (2016). The Concept of Extraordinary Crime in Indonesia Legal System: is The Concept An Effective Criminal Policy? Humaniora, 7(4), 513. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v7i4.3604
Sinaga, J. F., Ediwarman, & Mulyadi, M. (2022). Comparison Between Indonesia and the United States in Enforcement of Narcotics Illicit Trafficking. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220204.004
Yousa, A. (2007). Kebijakan Publik, Teori dan Proses. Laboratorium Pengkajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Administrasi Negara, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Padjajaran.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Andy Alfatih, Diana Dewi Sartika, Dyah Hapsari Eko Nueraheni, Nabila Tahira