Keywords
How to Cite
Share
- Abstract 87
- PDF (English) 80
Abstract
This study examines the role of the Sustainable Livelihood Approach (SLA) in supporting aquaculture households in Sidoarjo Regency as they adapt to structural shifts driven by industrialization and urbanization. The research analyzes how sustainable livelihood strategies enhance the economic stability of pond-based households impacted by land-use change. Using a quantitative approach with descriptive analysis, the study employs Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) to evaluate the influence of key variables. Conducted in Kalisogo Pond Village, the study uses purposive sampling based on criteria such as economic reliance on aquaculture and sector experience. Data were gathered through questionnaires and analyzed for model validity and reliability. Findings indicate that the SLA significantly bolsters pond households’ adaptive capacity to structural shifts. Income diversification through non-aquaculture activities enhances economic stability and reduces dependence on pond farming. Social capital further supports households by strengthening local community networks. The study underscores the importance of institutional backing and microcredit access for aquaculture households. Policymakers and financial institutions are encouraged to support sustainable adaptation measures. These findings offer valuable insights into the SLA’s application amid structural changes in industrialized coastal regions.
References
Bakri, W., Laupe, S., & Salam, A. M. I. (2023). Karts Area Mining and Social Conditions Communities. SOSIOLOGIA: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat, 3(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.35905/sosiologia.v2i1.5283
Diartho, H. C. (2018). Pengembangan Wilayah Perdesaan Berbasis Pada Potensi Sumber Daya Alam di Kabupaten Bondowoso. Ekonomikawan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Studi Pembangunan, 18(2), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.30596/ekonomikawan.v18i2.2528
Fahad, S., Nguyen-Thi-Lan, H., Nguyen-Manh, D., Tran-Duc, H., & To-The, N. (2023). Analyzing the status of multidimensional poverty of rural households by using sustainable livelihood framework: policy implications for economic growth. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(6), 16106–16119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23143-0
Fan, Y., Chen, J., Shirkey, G., John, R., Wu, S. R., Park, H., & Shao, C. (2016). Applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) in ecological studies: an updated review. Ecological Processes, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3
Fatkhullah, M., Mulyani, I., & Imawan, B. (2021). Strategi Pengembangan Masyarakat Petani Lahan Gambut melalui Program Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan: Analisis Pendekatan Penghidupan Berkelanjutan. Journal of Social Development Studies, 2(2), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsds.2186
Gai, A. M., Poerwati, T., Maghfirah, F., & Sir, M. M. (2020). Analysis of Sustainable Livelihood level and its Influence on Community Vulnerability of Surumana Village, Central Sulawesi. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 4(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2020.4.3.209-220
Israr, M., Yaseen, A., & Ahmad, S. (2017). Sustainable Rural Development and Livelihood Sources of the Rural Households in Mountainous Pakistan. American Journal of Rural Development, 5(4), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajrd-5-4-2
Kumar, A., Kumar, A., Kumari, S., Kumari, N., Kumari, S., & Mishra, P. (2023). Sustainable Livelihoods a Foundation for Rural Development Leads to Sustainability. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3951
Luo, L., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Fang, X. (2022). Where is the pathway to sustainable urban development? Coupling coordination evaluation and configuration analysis between low-carbon development and eco-environment: A case study of the Yellow River Basin, China. Ecological Indicators, 144, 109473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109473
Meraj, G., Kanga, S., Kranjčić, N., Đurin, B., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Role of Natural Capital Economics for Sustainable Management of Earth Resources. Earth, 2(3), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth2030036
Rinaldi, N., Erfit, E., & Rosmeli, R. (2022). Transformasi Struktural Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Aktual, 1(3), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.53867/jea.v1i3.19
Sapkota, B. D. (2021). Sustainable Livelihoods Approach: Alternative to Rural Development. Triyuga Academic Journal, 2, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.3126/taj.v2i1.45619
Sasmita, M. A., Palit, A. P., & Yasin, M. (2023). Konsep Transformasi Struktural Pada Sektor Industri. Journal of Creative Student Research, 1(3), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.55606/jcsrpolitama.v1i3.1766
Shang, H., Hu, Y., Fan, J., Song, N., & Su, F. (2023). Analysis of Farm Household Livelihood Sustainability Based on Improved IPAT Equation: A Case Study of 24 Counties in 3 Cities in the Qin-Ba Mountain Region of Southern Shaanxi. Land, 12(5), 980. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12050980
Singh, R., Dell’Angelo, J., Oguge, N., & Odote, C. (2024). The role of livelihoods in agrifood sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 50, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100799
Su, F., Song, N., Ma, N., Sultanaliev, A., Ma, J., Xue, B., & Fahad, S. (2021). An Assessment of Poverty Alleviation Measures and Sustainable Livelihood Capability of Farm Households in Rural China: A Sustainable Livelihood Approach. Agriculture, 11(12), 1230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121230
Sugiyono. (2018). Statistik Non Parametris untuk Penelitian (Baru). Alfabeta.
Tan, S. J., Wong, S. K., & Abdullah, R. G. (2021). Sustainable Livelihood Strategies of The Riverine Communities at Sadong Jaya, Sarawak, Malaysia: Role of Capital Assets. Studies of Applied Economics, 39(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i1.4271
Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2013). Economic Development. Economic Development (11th ed.). Pearson education.
Ulukan, D., Bergkvist, G., Lana, M., Fasse, A., Mager, G., Öborn, I., & Chopin, P. (2022). Combining sustainable livelihood and farm sustainability approaches to identify relevant intensification options: Implications for households with crop-based and gathering-based livelihoods in Tanzania. Ecological Indicators, 144, 109518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109518
Wibisono, G., Nukha, R., & Bina Margiana, D. (2023). Sustainable Livelihood Framework Sebagai Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Tambak Kalisogo, Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Islamic Management and Empowerment Journal, 5(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.18326/imej.v5i1.73-86
Xiong, F., Zhu, S., Xiao, H., Kang, X., & Xie, F. (2021). Does Social Capital Benefit the Improvement of Rural Households’ Sustainable Livelihood Ability? Based on the Survey Data of Jiangxi Province, China. Sustainability, 13(19), 10995. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910995
Yoga, Y. N. D., & Pinasti, V. I. S. (2021). Dampak Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Petani Tambak Dengan Adanya Pembangunan Yia Kabupaten Kulon Progo. E-Societas: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.21831/e-societas.v10i3.17166
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Herman Cahyo Diartho, Mery Cindio Elan, Aisah Jumiati