Policy Neutralisation and Market Constraints: A Political Economy Analysis of How Liberalisation Fails Private Universities in Indonesia
Society Volume 13 Issue 3#2025
PDF (English)

Keywords

Indonesia Liberalisation Failure Market Constraints Political Economy Policy Neutralisation Private Universities

How to Cite

Sampurna, R. H., Sulaeman, S., & Anwar, Z. L. (2025). Policy Neutralisation and Market Constraints: A Political Economy Analysis of How Liberalisation Fails Private Universities in Indonesia. Society, 13(3), 1118-1132. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i3.763

Share

Views
  • Abstract 0
  • PDF (English) 0
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

This study provides a political economy analysis of how higher education liberalisation fails private universities in Indonesia through policy neutralisation and market constraints. Using path analysis, we conducted a census of 20 private universities in Sukabumi, with 60 respondents, to investigate the direct and mediated effects of liberalisation policies on economic performance through student enrolment. Our findings reveal that liberalisation policies have no significant effects on either economic performance or student enrollment, accounting for only 6.7% of enrollment variance. In contrast, student enrollment shows a robust positive relationship with economic performance, accounting for over 50% of institutional performance variance. These results demonstrate how market constraints—demographic limitations, competitive saturation, and resource scarcity—systematically neutralise the benefits of liberalisation for private universities. The absence of liberalisation effects contradicts neoliberal theoretical expectations, while the strong enrollment-performance linkage confirms resource dependence in tuition-dependent models. Our political economy analysis reveals that state policy advantages for public universities create asymmetric competition that undermines private institutions. The study demonstrates how market constraints generate policy-neutralisation effects, necessitating direct enrolment support mechanisms rather than market-oriented reforms for sustainable private university development in constrained contexts.

PDF (English)

References

Ahmad, F. (2021). IPB University berikan kemudahan untuk mahasiswa, cek di sini. Radar Sukabumi. https://radarsukabumi.com/pendidikan/ipb-university-berikan-kemudahan-untuk-mahasiswa-cek-di-sini/

Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2007). Hidden privatisation in public education. Education International, July.

Baum, S., & McPherson, M. (2023). Campus economics: How economic thinking can help improve college and university decisions. Princeton University Press.

Cheben, J., Lancaric, D., Munk, M., & Obdrzalek, P. (2020). Determinants of economic sustainability in higher education institutions. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(54), 462–479.

Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Fryar, A. B. T.-H. education: H. of theory and research. (2012). What do we mean by privatisation in higher education? (M. N. Bastedo (ed.); Vol. 27, pp. 521–547). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6_11

Goksu, A., & Goksu, G. G. (2015). A comparative analysis of higher education financing in different countries. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1152–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00945-4

IndoProgress. (2023). RUU Sisdiknas, liberalisasi pendidikan? https://indoprogress.com/2023/10/ruu-sisdiknas-liberal/

Jesudason, T., Mahendradhata, Y., & Tirtosudarmo, R. (2018). Beyond access: Making Indonesia’s education system work. Lowy Institute for International Policy.

Kotzmann, J. B. T.-T. human rights-based approach to higher education. (2018). Theoretical approaches to higher education (pp. 15–42). Oxford University Press.

Leiber, T. (2019). A general theory of learning and teaching and a related comprehensive set of performance indicators for higher education institutions. Quality in Higher Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/shareview/10.1080/13538322.2019.1594030

Leohlin, J. C. (2004). Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis. Psychology Press.

Marginson, S., Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2022). The political economy of higher education governance in Asia: Challenges, trends and trajectories. Springer.

McClure, K. B. T.-P. as the N. N. in H. E. (2020). Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (L. W. Perna (ed.); Vol. 35). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31365-4

Mok, K. H., & Jiang, J. (2018). Massification of higher education and challenges for graduate employment and social mobility: East Asian experiences and sociological reflections. International Journal of Educational Development, 63, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.02.003

Navas, L. P., Montes, F., Abolghasem, S., Salas, R. J., Toloo, M., & Zarama, R. (2020). Colombian higher education institutions evaluation. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100801.

PDDikti. (2023). Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi. https://pddikti.kemdikbud.go.id/search/sukabumi

Qureshi, F. H., & Khawaja, S. (2021). The Growth of Private Higher Education: An Overview in the Context of Liberalisation, Privatisation and Marketisation. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i9.3896

Sampaio, H. (2015). Higher Education in Brazil: Stratification in the Privatization of Enrollment. In Mitigating Inequality: Higher Education Research, Policy, and Practice in an Era of Massification and Stratification (Vol. 11, pp. 53–81). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-358X20150000011005

Shree, V. (2023). Liberalisation, privatisation, globalisation and its impact on higher education. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Scientific Research (IJAMSR), 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.31426/ijamsr.2023.6.2.6051

Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press.

Streiner, D. L. (2005). Finding Our Way: An Introduction to Path Analysis. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50(2), 115–122.

Suryomenggolo, J. (2020). Kampus Merdeka: Liberalisasi pendidikan tinggi? https://www.lppmdunpad.com/2020/04/kampus-merdeka-liberalisasi-pendidikan.html

Tilak, J. (2024). The ever growing private higher education, critical yet underexamined. Higher Education, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01269-z

Toutkoushian, R. K., & Paulsen, M. B. (2016). Economics of higher education. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7506-9

Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Zancajo, A. (2016). The privatization of education: A political economy of global education reform. Teachers College Press.

Volchik, V., & Maslyukova, E. (2017). Performance and sustainability of higher education: Key indicators versus academic values. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 501–512. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.6.3(14)

Wu, X., & Zha, X. (2017). Higher education reforms and the expansion of private universities in China. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(4), 345–359.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Rizki Hegia Sampurna, Sulaeman Sulaeman, Zahra Laisha Anwar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.