Ecological Identity and Social Representation of Green MSMEs: Ergo-Iconic Value, Performativity, and Representational Resistance in the Platform Economy
Society Volume 13 Issue 2#2025
PDF (English)

Keywords

Ecological Identity Ergo-Iconic Value Indonesian Green MSMEs Platform Economy Social Representation

How to Cite

Andriyansah, A. (2025). Ecological Identity and Social Representation of Green MSMEs: Ergo-Iconic Value, Performativity, and Representational Resistance in the Platform Economy. Society, 13(2), 877-894. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i2.815

Share

Views
  • Abstract 95
  • PDF (English) 54
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

Amid growing market demands for sustainability, several green micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia have begun to construct ecological identities through digital media as a strategy for value differentiation. However, these representational practices go beyond mere commercial promotion. They reflect a complex interplay between local values, global consumer expectations, and the algorithmic logic embedded within digital platforms. This study investigates how green MSME actors construct, negotiate, and perform social representations of sustainability in digital spaces. Employing an interpretive qualitative approach, the study adopts a multi-sited case study design. It uses visual-narrative analysis to examine digital campaign content from MSMEs engaged in plastic recycling, ecoprint textile production, and natural honey harvesting. Data were collected through online observation, digital document analysis, and limited narrative interviews, and analyzed through the theoretical lenses of social representation, ecological identity, performativity, and platform economy. The findings reveal three dominant patterns: (1) the symbolization of ergo-iconic value, combining tangible ecological practices with aesthetic visualizations as symbolic capital; (2) performative and algorithm-driven sustainability, where content is crafted to attract visibility within a competitive platform ecosystem; and (3) representational resistance, where certain MSMEs choose to highlight complex ecological processes that may not be “Instagrammable” but are instead educational and contextually grounded. The study concludes that the ecological identities of green MSMEs in Indonesia are shaped through representational labor that is symbolic, relational, and conditioned by structural asymmetries within the digital economy. These findings contribute to the fields of environmental communication, digital moral economies, and sustainability strategies in the context of the Global South.

PDF (English)

References

Andriyansah, Ginting, G., Fatimah, F., Nurunisa, V. F., Nataliani, N. P., & Saragih, C. L. (2024). Reciprocal value of SMEs products in strengthening sustainable green competitiveness for economic growth in Indonesia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDG’S Review, 5(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe04130

Andriyansah, Hidayah, Z., Rulinawaty, Noviyanti, M., Isnarno, E., & Indriasari, R. (2024). Investing in ergo-iconic value of distance scientific seminars organisers in the COVID-19 pandemic to improve organiser performance. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 18(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKL.2025.145995

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Profil Industri Mikro dan Kecil 2023. Badan Pusat Statistik.

Banet-Weiser, S. (2012). AuthenticTM: The politics of ambivalence in a brand culture. New York University Press.

Banks, M. (2007). Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.

Barki, E., Comini, G., Cunliffe, A., Hart, S., & Rai, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: Retrospective and prospective research. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55(4), 380–384. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020150402

Bhardwaj, S., Nair, K., Tariq, M. U., Ahmad, A., & Chitnis, A. (2023). The state of research in green marketing: A bibliometric review from 2005 to 2022. Sustainability, 15(4), 2988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042988

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

Carah, N., & Shaul, M. (2015). Brands and Instagram: Point, tap, swipe, glance. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157915598180

Carfagna, L. B., Dubois, E. A., Fitzmaurice, C., Ouimette, M. Y., Schor, J. B., Willis, M., & Laidley, T. (2014). An emerging eco-habitus: The reconfiguration of high cultural capital practices among ethical consumers. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14(2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540514526227

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention–behavior gap. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2759–2767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.022

Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9

Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition BT - Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (S. Clayton & S. Opotow (eds.); pp. 45–65). MIT Press.

Climate Transparency. (2022). Climate Transparency Report 2022. https://www.climate-transparency.org/g20-climate-performance/g20report2022

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Dijck, J. van, Poell, T., & Waal, M. de. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

Duffy, B. E. (2017). (Not) getting paid to do what you love: Gender, social media, and aspirational work. Yale University Press.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. EU Publications.

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books.

Hartmann, P., & Ibáñez, V. A. (2006). Green value added. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(7), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610711842

Hermajiwandini, C. M. D. W., Ngarbingan, H. K., Ulfah, I. F., Prasetiyo, Y., Wijaya, R. A. T., & Andriyansah. (2024). Tourism technology with ergo-iconic value innovation for sustainable economic development. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(4s), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i4s.496

Holt, D. B. (2002). Why do brands cause trouble? A dialectical theory of consumer culture and branding. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/339922

Kemper, J. A., & Ballantine, P. W. (2019). What do we mean by sustainability marketing? Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3–4), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1573845

Kraus, S., Durst, S., Ferreira, J. J. M., Veiga, P. M., Kailer, N., & Weinmann, A. (2021). Digital transformation in business and management research: An overview of the current status quo. International Journal of Information Management, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102466

MAFF Japan. (2023). Trends in Organic Food Exports. MAFF Japan.

Moscovici, S. (1984). The Phenomenon of Social Representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social Representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge University Press.

Ndiaye, N., Abdul Razak, L., Nagayev, R., & Ng, A. (2018). Demystifying small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) performance in emerging and developing economies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2018.04.003

Organic Without Boundaries. (2021). OFIA 2021 Grand Prize: A Multidimensional Approach to Promoting Organic in Indonesia. https://www.organicwithoutboundaries.bio/2021/08/20/ofia-2021-grand-prize-a-multidimensional-approach-to-promoting-organic-in-indonesia/

Purnawan, S. O. (2024). Pengaruh Pelatihan Pemasaran Digital Dan Peran Media Sosial Terhadap Pengembangan UMKM Di Sidoarjo. Jurnal Manajemen, 14(1), 33–47.

Qayyum, A., Jamil, R. A., & Sehar, A. (2023). Impact of green marketing, greenwashing and green confusion on green brand equity. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 27(3), 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-03-2022-0032

Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL). (2021). The State of Sustainable Markets 2021: Statistics and Emerging Trends. ITC.

Rose, G. (2016). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Sari, N. Y. (2022). Penerapan strategi digital marketing dalam peningkatan pendapatan pelaku UMKM pada masa pandemi COVID-19 perspektif ekonomi Islam. Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.

Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Thompson, C. J., & Coskuner-Balli, G. (2007). Countervailing market responses to corporate co-optation and the ideological recruitment of consumption communities. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1086/519143

Townsend, L., & Wallace, C. (2016). Social media research: A guide to ethics. University of Aberdeen and ESRC.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2019). UNCTAD annual report 2019. United Nations. https://unctad.org/annualreport/2019/Pages/index.html

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Andriyansah Andriyansah

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.