The Digital Era and the Evolution of Media Paradigms: A Critical Review of the Adaptation of Old Media in New Media Ecosystems
Society Volume 13 Issue 1#2025
PDF (English)

Keywords

Algorithm Critical Discourse Analysis Digital Convergence Epistemic Crisis Legacy Media Media Paradigm New Media

How to Cite

Yusnaini, . Y., Nufus, H., Saleh, R., & Wibowo, W. A. S. (2025). The Digital Era and the Evolution of Media Paradigms: A Critical Review of the Adaptation of Old Media in New Media Ecosystems. Society, 13(1), 573-599. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.853

Share

Views
  • Abstract 327
  • PDF (English) 248
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

This study examines the paradigm shift of traditional media in the face of the digital era, focusing on the adaptation processes and forms of media convergence through Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) approach. The research analyzes the discourse representations of digitalization constructed by four media institutions, BBC, TVRI, Kompas, and The Guardian, through official documents, corporate statements, and strategic content. This study aims to explore how traditional media constructs its identity in response to the demands of digital platforms and how the power structures and ideologies behind this transformation process unfold. The main findings reveal that media transformation is not only technical but also reflects changes in power structures, ideological values, and epistemic dynamics. At the textual level, media adaptation is constructed through narratives of innovation and participation, yet it retains the institutional dominance of traditional media. At the level of discursive practices, media institutions adopt multiplatform strategies and user engagement; however, public participation remains structurally controlled by the media organizations. Meanwhile, at the social practice level, there is a negotiation between traditional journalistic values and the increasingly dominant digital algorithmic logic in content management. The shift in media paradigms from linear, centralized communication models to participatory, modular, and decentralized many-to-many communication models has introduced new challenges, such as epistemic crises, misinformation, and digital platform dominance. Despite this, traditional media still strives to maintain its relevance in the increasingly complex digital media ecosystem. This study contributes theoretically by recommending the need for deeper critical digital literacy, as well as a reformulation of journalistic values to address the challenges of misinformation and technological dominance. An interdisciplinary approach is essential to better understand communication within the contemporary media landscape, which is increasingly dominated by digital platforms.

PDF (English)

References

Baudrillard, J. (2010). Simulacra dan Simulasi. In Crime and Media: Reader.

Berkovich, I., & Benoliel, P. (2024). CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS: Language, ideology, and power. In Analysing Education Policy: Theory and Method (pp. 28–43). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003353379-5

British Broadcasting Corporation. (2024). BBC Annual Plan 2024/25. British Broadcasting Corporation. https://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/documents/bbc-annual-plan-2024-2025.pdf

Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press.

Chagas, L. B. R., & Paula, L. T. de. (2023). Análise de Discurso Crítica como instrumental teórico e metodológico para a garantia semântica em Linguagens Documentárias. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência Da Informação, 28, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e90893

Esposito, E., & KhosraviNik, M. (2023). Discourse in the Digital Age: Social Media, Power, and Society. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003300786

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge.

Flew, T. (2008). New Media: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Hellmann, K. U. (2009). Prosumerism in the Age of Internet Economy. Sws-Rundschau, 49(1), 67–73.

Hodge, B. (2014). Critical Electronic Discourse Analysis. In Digital Arts and Entertainment (Vol. 1, pp. 306–323). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6114-1.ch014

Jenkins, H. (2008). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. MIT Press.

Kompas Media Nusantara. (2022). Kompas Media Report February 2022. Kompas Media Nusantara. https://korporasi.kompas.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Kompas-Media-Report-FEB-2022.pdf

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

O’Halloran, K. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics (pp. 445–459). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835654

Pavlik, J. V. (2001). Journalism and New Media. Columbia University Press.

Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press.

Televisi Republik Indonesia. (2024). Digital Transformation Through Over The Top Technology, LPP TVRI Launches TVRI Trends. Televisi Republik Indonesia. https://nasional.tvrinews.com/berita/tb7f7q9-transformasi-digital-melalui-teknologi-over-the-top-lpp-tvri-luncurkan-tvri-trends

The Guardian. (2024). The Guardian Unveils New Mobile App and Major Homepage Redesign. Guardian News and Media.

Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave.

Wodak, R. (2006). Dilemmas of Discourse: A Critical Perspective. Language in Society, 35(4), 595–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404506060271

Yang, P. L. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of Taiwan’s national debate on economic TIES with China. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 11(2), 83–104.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Yusnaini Yusnaini, Hayatun Nufus, Rahmat Saleh, Wahyu Adi Setyo Wibowo

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.