Abstract
The presence of women in the political sphere is often celebrated as an achievement in the agenda of gender equality and democratization. However, such representation does not always reflect true political independence. In many cases at the local level, women’s involvement forms part of a dynastic political strategy that relies on kinship ties to maintain power. This research examines how women are used as proxies of power within the context of dynastic politics rooted in patriarchal structures. Using a qualitative approach and a case study design, this research explores the symbolic representation practices of a female political actor in a region in South Sulawesi. She advanced in the political contest with strong support from a family power network that has long dominated the local political landscape. Through a theoretical framework on dynastic politics and power proxies, this study reveals that women’s involvement does not always strengthen empowerment agendas but can instead serve as an instrument for perpetuating family power dominance. These findings highlight the ambiguity between representation and empowerment, as well as the importance of distinguishing women’s symbolic presence from participation based on individual autonomy and capacity. This study contributes to a critical understanding of the relationship between gender, power, and the persistence of dynastic politics in local electoral democracy.
References
Aspinall, E. (2014). Indonesia’s 2014 Elections: Parliament and Patronage. Journal of Democracy, 25(4), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2014.0070
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2014). Democracy For Sale. In Design By Ikea (Vol. 291, Issue 18, pp. 109–124). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293945.ch-006
Aspinall, E., White, S., & Savirani, A. (2021). Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia: Who Wins and How? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421989720
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2019). Process-Tracing Methods. In Process-Tracing Methods. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.10072208
Blackburn, S. (2004). Women and the State in Modern Indonesia. In Women and the State in Modern Indonesia. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492198
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brady, H. E., Collier, D., & Seawright, J. (2010). Refocusing The Discussion Of Methodology. In Rethinking Social Inquiry (pp. 15–32). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216385530.ch-001
Butt, S. (2015). 10 The rule of law and anti-corruption reforms under Yudhoyono: the rise of the KPK and the Constitutional Court. In The Yudhoyono Presidency (pp. 175–196). ISEAS Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814620727-013
Celis, K., & Childs, S. (2018). Conservatism and Women’s Political Representation. Politics & Gender, 14(01), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X17000575
Choi, N. (2012). Local Politics in Indonesia. In Local Politics in Indonesia: Pathways to Power. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805596
Choi, N. (2019). Women’s political pathways in Southeast Asia. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21(2), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1523683
Clayton, A. (2021). How Do Electoral Gender Quotas Affect Policy? Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102019
Clayton, A., Josefsson, C., & Wang, V. (2014). Present Without Presence? Gender, Quotas and Debate Recognition in the Ugandan Parliament. Representation, 50(3), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2014.951232
Clayton, A., Josefsson, C., & Wang, V. (2017). Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Evidence from a Content Analysis of Ugandan Plenary Debates. Politics & Gender, 13(02), 276–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X16000453
Collier, D. (2011). Understanding Process Tracing. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(4), 823–830. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511001429
Collier, D., Brady, H. E., & Seawright, J. (2010). Sources Of Leverage In Causal Inference: Toward An Alternative View Of Methodology. In Rethinking Social Inquiry (pp. 161–200). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216385530.ch-009
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (M. Markanich (ed.)). Sage Publications.
Fenichel Pitkin, H. (1967). The Concept of Representation. In The Concept of Representation. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340503
Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. M. (2008). Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender, 4(3), 393–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X08000342
Gerring, J. (2006). Case Study Research. In Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803123
Hillman, B. (2018). The Limits of Gender Quotas: Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48(2), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2017.1368092
Htun, M. (2016). Inclusion without representation in Latin America: Gender quotas and ethnic reservations. In Inclusion without Representation in Latin America: Gender Quotas and Ethnic Reservations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021067
Johnson, K. E., & Stake, R. E. (1996). The Art of Case Study Research. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 556. https://doi.org/10.2307/329758
Kenawas, Y. C. (2023). The irony of Indonesia’s democracy: The rise of dynastic politics in the post-Suharto era. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 8(3), 748–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231195970
Klinken, G. van. (2007). Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia. In Communal Violence and Democratization in Indonesia: Small Town Wars. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203965115
Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for Women in Politics. In Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375671.001.0001
Lovenduski, J. (2002). Feminizing politics. In Women: A Cultural Review (Vol. 13, Issue 2). Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09574040210149004
Margret, A. (2025). The Paradox in Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia: More Women in Politics, But What Changes? In Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Asia. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Asia. https://asia.fes.de/news/the-paradox-in-womens-political-representation-in-indonesia-more-women-in-politics-but-what-changes.html
Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2016). Political dynasties and poverty: measurement and evidence of linkages in the Philippines. Oxford Development Studies, 44(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1169264
Mietzner, M. (2015). Dysfunction by Design: Political Finance and Corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991
Mietzner, M. (2020). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
Murray, R. (2010). Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office. In Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women’s Campaigns for Executive Office. Bloomsbury Academic. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ZxTDwxdWgvAC
Noak, P. A. (2024). Analysis Of the Existence of Political Dynasties in Village Head Elections in Indonesia. International Journal of Religion, 5(10), 1135–1145. https://doi.org/10.61707/4bnbga38
Norris, P., & Lovenduski, J. (1995). Political recruitment: gender, race and class in the British parliament. Choice Reviews Online, 33(02), 33-1163-33–1163. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.33-1163
Parawansa, K. I. (2002). Obstacles to Women’s Political Participation in Indonesia. In Stockholm: International IDEA. https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/chapters/women-in-parliament/perempuan-di-parlemen-bukan-sekedar-jumlah-EN-case-study-indonesia-2.pdf
Paxton, P. (1997). Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis. Social Science Research, 26(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1997.0603
Phillips, A., & Asenbaum, H. (2023). The Politics of Presence Revisited. Democratic Theory, 10(2), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2023.100208
Prihatini, E. S. (2018). Indonesian young voters: Political knowledge and electing women into parliament. Women’s Studies International Forum, 70, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.07.015
Prihatini, E. S. (2019). Women’s views and experiences of accessing National Parliament: Evidence from Indonesia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 74, 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.03.001
Prihatini, E. S. (2020). Women and social media during legislative elections in Indonesia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 83, 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2020.102417
Querubin, P. (2016). Family and Politics: Dynastic Persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 151–181. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014182
Rai, S. M. (2003). Political representation, democratic institutions and women’s empowerment: The quota debate in India1. Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World, 6(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203220078-11
Rinaldo, R. (2014). Pious and Critical: Muslim Women Activists and the Question of Agency. Gender and Society, 28(6), 824–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214549352
Robinson, K. (2008). Gender, Islam and Democracy in Indonesia. In Gender, Islam and Democracy in Indonesia. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203891759
Sarah, C., & Mona, L. K. (2008). Critical Mass Theory and Women’s Political Representation. Political Studies, 56(3), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00712.x
Shair-Rosenfield, S., & Hinojosa, M. (2014). Does Female Incumbency Reduce Gender Bias in Elections? Evidence from Chile. Political Research Quarterly, 67(4), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914550044
Slater, D. (2004). Indonesia’s Accountability Trap: Party Cartels and Presidential Power after Democratic Transition.
Suryakusuma, J. I. (2011). State ibuism : the social construction of womanhood in New Order Indonesia. Institute of Social Studies, The Hague. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=dNt-GwAACAAJ
Tomsa, D. (2014). Party System Fragmentation in Indonesia: The Subnational Dimension. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(2), 249–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800008924
Wardani, S. B. E., & Subekti, V. S. (2021). Political Dynasties and Women Candidates in Indonesia’s 2019 Election. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103421991144
Waylen, G. (2007). Engendering Transitions. In Engendering Transitions: Women’s Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248032.001.0001
Weldon, S. L. (2002). Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence against Women. In Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence against Women. University of Pittsburgh Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zw85q
White, S., Warburton, E., Pramashavira, Hendrawan, A., & Aspinall, E. (2024). Voting against Women: Political Patriarchy, Islam, and Representation in Indonesia. Politics & Gender, 20(2), 391–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X23000648
Williams, W. S. (2016). Sexual Politics in Poetry. In George Eliot, Poetess (pp. 75–114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315584577-10
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications (S. Edition (ed.)). Sage Publication Inc.
Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford University Press.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Febrianto Syam, Ismah Tita Ruslin, Novayanti Sopia Rukmana S, Ummi Suci Fathia Bailusy

