Exploring the Benefits of a Social Responsibility Application (SR App) in Optimizing the Governance of Community Development Programs: A Study of the Inovasi Muda Indonesia Foundation
Society Volume 13 Issue 1#2025
PDF (English)

Keywords

Community Empowerment Digital Platform E-Governance Non-Profit Organization Social Responsibility

How to Cite

Wahjudin, L., & Rinaldi, R. (2025). Exploring the Benefits of a Social Responsibility Application (SR App) in Optimizing the Governance of Community Development Programs: A Study of the Inovasi Muda Indonesia Foundation. Society, 13(1), 600-611. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.824

Share

Views
  • Abstract 72
  • PDF (English) 57
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

The growing integration of digital technologies into organizational operations has transformed the governance landscape, particularly for non-profit institutions managing complex community development programs. This study examines the role of a Social Responsibility Application (SR App) in enhancing the governance performance of community empowerment initiatives through a digital platform. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the research focuses on the Inovasi Muda Indonesia Foundation. This non-profit organization has adopted the SR App to improve its social programs' efficiency, transparency, and accountability. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and secondary sources, involving five purposively selected users of the SR App. The findings reveal several benefits of the application, including a more structured governance workflow, real-time program monitoring, accelerated and interactive reporting, and improved data analytics for strategic decision-making. These insights demonstrate how digital transformation can support non-profit organizations in implementing good governance practices and achieving greater impact through technology-enabled community development. The study offers practical implications for other non-profits aiming to strengthen their governance through e-governance tools.

PDF (English)

References

Agostino, D., Arnaboldi, M., & Lema, M. D. (2021). New development: COVID-19 accelerates digital transformation in public service delivery. Public Money & Management, 41(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2020.1764206

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003

International Organization for Standardization. (2017). ISO 26000:2010—Guidance on social responsibility. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html

Jong, C. L. K., & Ganzaroli, A. (2024). Managing Digital Transformation for Social Good in Non-Profit Organizations: The Case of The Felix Project Zeroing Hunger in London. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 35(3), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-023-00597-5

Kindlink. (2022). Top Corporate Social Responsibility Trends in 2022 / 2023. Kindlink. https://www.kindlink.com/blog/top-corporate-social-responsibility-trends-in-2022-2023

Margetts, H., & Dorobantu, C. (2019). Rethink government with AI. Nature, 568(7751), 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01099-5

Mayne, J. (2020). Building evaluative culture in community services: Caring for evidence. Evaluation and Program Planning, 80, 101450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.05.011

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/48004323.pdf

Ortega-Rodríguez, C., Licerán-Gutiérrez, A., & Moreno-Albarracín, A. L. (2020). Transparency as a Key Element in Accountability in Non-Profit Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12(14), 5834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145834

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Botella-Carrubi, D., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Orero-Blat, M. (2021). The effect of digitalization on business performance: An applied study of KIBS. Journal of Business Research, 126, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.065

Rosário, A., & Dias, J. (2022). Sustainability and the Digital Transition: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 14(7), 4072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074072

Shin, B., Floch, J., Rask, M., Bæck, P., Edgar, C., Berditchevskaia, A., Mesure, P., & Branlat, M. (2024). A systematic analysis of digital tools for citizen participation. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), 101954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101954

Tejedo-Romero, F., Araujo, J. F. F. E., Tejada, Á., & Ramírez, Y. (2022). E-government mechanisms to enhance the participation of citizens and society: Exploratory analysis through the dimension of municipalities. Technology in Society, 70, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101978

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Lisdawati Wahjudin, Ridho Rinaldi

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.