How to Cite
Share
- Abstract 455
- PDF (Indonesian) 524
Abstract
The turning point of the agrarian reform of the customary forest arena after the Constitutional Court's Decision 35/PUU-X/2012 can not be based on state domination (government) through the agenda of territorialization of the forest and not on AMAN as representation of indigenous struggle from the paradox of interest. Bringing the alternative of a critical new middle class, as well as running a deliberation democracy through representational politics that combine extra parliamentary and intra-parliamentary struggles simultaneously in organizational form, capable of realizing sustainable agrarian reform. The new middle class struggle is a synthesis of the dialectic of forest recognition and the existence of indigenous peoples undergoing involution.
References
AMAN, 2011. Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-undang Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Jakarta: AMAN.
Arief, A dan Patria N, 2009. Antonio Gramsci Negara dan Hegemoni. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Arizona, Y. Mempertanyakan Kebangkitan Adat. Jurnal Jentera, Edisi 21 Tahun IV Januari-April 2011, hal. 96-102.
Arizona, Y, Malik, Ishimora LI. Pengakuan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat Adat: Tren Produk Hukum Daerah dan Nasional Pasca Putusan MK 35/PUU-X/2012. Outlook Epistema 2017. Jakarta: Epistema Institue.
Aziz, UA. Masyarakat Kelas Menengah Indonesia: Terkurung Dalam Paradigma Kapitalisme Pinggiran. Makalah diakses 8 Oktober 2017 pukul 19.45 WIB.
Corntassel, J. 2012. Re-envisioning Resurgence: Indigenous Pathways to Batin Pengambang Jambi). Dalam Politik Ruang dan Perlawanan: Kisah Konflik atas Ruang di Tingkat Lokal. Bogor: Jaringan Kerja Pemetaan Partisipatif.
Hardiman, B.F, 2009. Menuju Masyarakat Komunikatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Jati, R.W. Mendefinisikan Kelas Menengah. Jurnal Online LIPI www.lipi.go.id Edisi Februari 2015.
Kedai (Kelompok Diskusi Adat Indonesia). Refleksi Gerakan Masyarakat Adat. Hasil Diskusi Bersama AMAN, ELSAM, JAPHAMA, KPSHK dan ICRAF, Bogor 2001.
Li, T.M. 2000. Articulating Indigenous Identity in Indonesia: Resource Politics and the Tribal Slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History 42 (1): 149-179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500002632
Merlingen, M, 2006. Foucault and World Politics: Promises and Challenges of Extending Governmentality Theory to the European and Beyond. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2006. ISSN 0305-8298. Vol 35 No 1, pp. 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298060350010301
Moore J.B, 1973. “Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasent in the Making of the Modern World”.Penguin University Books.
Ploeg, van der DJ, 2008. The New Peasantries Struggle for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London – Sterling VA.
Rachman, F.N. Masyarakat Hukum Adat adalah Penyandang Hak, Subjek Hukum, dan Pemilik Wilayah Adat. Jurnal Wacana Nomor 33, Tahun XVI, 2014, hal.25-48.
Sangaji, A. 2010. Kritik terhadap gerakan masyarakat adat di Indonesia. Dalam buku Adat Dalam Politik Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia dan KITLV Jakarta.
Savitri, L.A, Rentang Batas dari Rekognisi Hutan Adat Dalam Kepengaturan Neoliberal. Jurnal Wacana Nomor 33, Tahun XVI, 2014, hal.61-98.
Seda, F. Kelas Menengah Indonesia: Gambaran Umum Konseptual. Dimuat dalam Jurnal Prisma Vol 31, No 1, Tahun 2012.
Siscawati, M. Pertarungan Penguasaan Hutan dan Perjuangan Perempuan Adat. Jurnal Wacana Nomor 33, Tahun XVI, 2014, hal.159-197.
Siregar, B.B, 2001. Politik Ketakutan Menelusuri Jejak Ketertinggalan Merajut Kerukunan Melintasi Krisis. Bogor: Penerbit P3R-YAE.
Suseno, M.F, 75 Tahun Jurgen Habermas. Majalah Basis No.11-12, Tahun ke-53, November-Desember 2004, hal. 4-13.
Wiradi, G, 2000. Reforma Agraria: Perjalanan yang Belum Berakhir. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
White, B, 2006. Di Antara Apologia Diskursus Kritis: Transisi Agraria dan Pelibatan Dunia Ilmiah di Indonesia. Dalam Buku Ilmu Sosial dan Kekuasaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Equinox Publishing Indonesia.
Yusriyadi, 2010. Industrialisasi dan Perubahan Fungsi Sosial Hak Milik Atas Tanah. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA).
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
