Abstract
Peter Berger attempt to redefine the nature and role of the sociology of knowledge, the first attempt to define the notion of “reality” and “knowledge”. Social phenomena were found in the experience of community that a continuous process, lived in the society as a whole in all its aspects (cognitive, psychomotor, emotional and intuitive). In other words, the social reality is implied in social interaction, social expressed in various social actions such as communicating through language, working through forms of social organization. This kind of social reality found in intersubjective experience. Intersubjective concept refers to the structure dimenasi public consciousness to individual consciousness in a special group who were with each other and interact.
Second, how to examine the experience intersubyektf so we can see their social construction of reality? in other words, this question also questioned how to prepare the sociological research that found the essence of society in social phenomena.
Third, the choice of logic which one needs to be applied in an effort to understand the social reality that have characteristics such as pluralist, dynamic, in the process of continuous change that ? The logic of the social sciences are what need to be controlled so that it is relevant to the interpretation of the sociological structure of public awareness as well as the structure of the individual consciousnes.
References
Agger, Ben. Teori Sosial Kritis: Kritik, Penerapan, dan Implikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2003.
Basrowi dan Sukidin. Metode Penelitian Perspektif Mikro: Grounded theory, Fenomenologi, Etnometodologi, Etnografi, Dramaturgi, Interaksi Simbolik, Hermeneutik, Konstruksi Sosial, Analisis Wacana, dan Metodologi Refleksi. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia, 2002.
Ba-Yunus, Ilyas dan Farid Ahmad. Sosiologi Islam dan Masyarakat Kontemporer. Jakarta: Mizan, 1988.
Berger, Peter L. Langit Suci; Agama sebagai Realitas Sosial. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1991.
____________, dan Thomas Luckmann. Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan: Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan. Jakarta: LP3ES, 1990.
Goodman, Douglas J. dan George Ritzer. Teori Sosiologi Modern. Edisi ke-6. Jakarta: Kencana, 2004.
Hardiman, Fransisco Budi. Kritik Ideologi: menyingkap kepentingan Pengetahuan bersama Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Buku Baik, 2004.
Poloma. Margaret M. Sosiologi Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
Ritzer, George. Sosiologi; Ilmu Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda, Jakarta, 1985.
Soeprapto, H.R. Riyadi. Interaksionisme Simbolik: Perspektif Sosiologi Modern. Yogyakarta: Averroes Press dan Pustaka Pelajar, 2002.
Zeitlin, Irving M. Memahami Kembali Sosiologi, Kritik Terhadap Sosiologi Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University press, 1995.
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share Alike (CC BY-NC-SA).
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.